74pages,THE ROLE OF MASS MEDIA IN THE ONGOING ANGLOPHONE CONFLICT IN CAMEROON: CASE STUDY OF CRTV.

CHAPTER ONE

BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY

Mass Media In The Ongoing Anglophone Conflict In Cameroon. Mass media refers to various platforms and tools used to disseminate information to a large audience, including television, radio, newspapers, and the internet. In conflict situations, mass media plays a pivotal role in shaping public perception, informing policy decisions, and influencing the course of the conflict. The focus keyword, “Mass Media in the Ongoing Anglophone Conflict in Cameroon,” refers to the specific ways in which media outlets, particularly the Cameroon Radio Television (CRTV), have been involved in covering and influencing the Anglophone crisis. This conflict, rooted in socio-political grievances and demands for autonomy by the English-speaking regions of Cameroon, has attracted significant media attention both locally and internationally.

The Anglophone conflict in Cameroon traces its roots to the colonial era, during which the country was divided between French and British control. After gaining independence in 1960, Cameroon adopted a centralized political system, which led to growing discontent among the English-speaking minority, who felt marginalized by the Francophone-dominated government. The crisis escalated in 2016 when protests by Anglophone lawyers and teachers over issues related to language, education, and governance were met with force by the Cameroonian government.

As the situation deteriorated, demands for federalism or outright independence for the Anglophone regions emerged, leading to an armed conflict between government forces and separatist groups. Throughout this period, mass media has played an important role in narrating the conflict, shaping narratives, and influencing both public opinion and governmental responses.

Mass Media in the Ongoing Anglophone Conflict in Cameroon

Mass media in the ongoing Anglophone conflict in Cameroon has had a dual role. On one hand, media platforms like CRTV, the state-owned broadcaster, have been used to promote the government’s narrative of unity and territorial integrity, often portraying the separatists as terrorists or rebels. On the other hand, the private media, including social media platforms, have served as spaces where alternative narratives—those of marginalization, oppression, and calls for independence—have thrived. As the conflict has evolved, the role of mass media has become increasingly complex, particularly as the state tightens control over media outlets and censors information deemed contrary to the national interest (Atem, 2018).

The presence of mass media in the ongoing Anglophone conflict in Cameroon has been instrumental in shaping public discourse. CRTV, being state-owned, plays a critical role in controlling the information available to the public. It largely presents the government’s perspective, emphasizing national unity and condemning the actions of separatists. This control over the narrative has had significant implications for how the conflict is perceived by both domestic and international audiences. For instance, CRTV has consistently highlighted the violent acts of separatists while downplaying reports of human rights abuses by government forces (Fongwa, 2020).

Mass media in the ongoing Anglophone conflict in Cameroon has also been a tool for propaganda. The government has used CRTV to portray itself as the legitimate authority seeking peace and stability, while depicting the Anglophone separatists as insurgents threatening national security. This approach aligns with a broader strategy of using state media to maintain control over information and suppress dissenting voices. By presenting the conflict in terms of national security and stability, the government has garnered support from segments of the population that view any disruption to the status quo as a threat to peace (Ndongmo, 2019).

Conversely, alternative media platforms, including independent newspapers, online blogs, and social media, have offered a different perspective on the crisis. These platforms have often been critical of the government’s handling of the conflict, highlighting issues such as human rights abuses, economic marginalization of the Anglophone regions, and the government’s refusal to engage in meaningful dialogue. In particular, social media has played a crucial role in giving voice to Anglophone activists and separatist leaders who might otherwise be silenced by the state-controlled media. As a result, the conflict has been portrayed in radically different ways depending on the media outlet, with each side using mass media to bolster their respective positions (Mukong, 2018).

CRTV’s Role in Shaping Public Perception

CRTV’s role as the primary state broadcaster gives it a monopoly over the national narrative. In the context of the Anglophone conflict, this has meant that CRTV has been at the forefront of shaping public perception, especially among the Francophone population who primarily consume state-run media. By framing the conflict as a rebellion against national unity and portraying government forces as defenders of peace, CRTV has helped to legitimize the government’s use of military force against the separatists. This has further polarized the conflict, as Anglophones view CRTV’s coverage as biased and unrepresentative of their grievances (Amin, 2021).

Additionally, mass media in the ongoing Anglophone conflict in Cameroon has faced challenges related to censorship and self-censorship. Journalists covering the conflict have often found themselves caught between reporting the facts and adhering to government-imposed restrictions. Those who report on human rights abuses or give airtime to separatist viewpoints risk being accused of supporting terrorism. This has led to a climate of fear and self-censorship within the Cameroonian media landscape, where many journalists prefer to report only what is officially sanctioned by the state (Ngwa, 2020).

The role of mass media in the ongoing Anglophone conflict in Cameroon also extends to the international arena. International media outlets have covered the crisis from a more neutral standpoint, often highlighting the humanitarian aspects of the conflict, including the displacement of civilians, the burning of villages, and the killing of civilians by both sides. However, the reach of international media within Cameroon is limited, and the majority of Cameroonians continue to rely on CRTV for news and information. This disparity in media consumption has created a situation where the narrative of the conflict is fragmented, with different groups subscribing to different versions of events depending on their preferred media outlets (Tande, 2021).

The impact of mass media on the ongoing Anglophone conflict in Cameroon cannot be overstated. Mass media, especially CRTV, has played a crucial role in shaping both domestic and international perceptions of the conflict. By controlling the flow of information, the government has been able to craft a narrative that serves its interests, while alternative media outlets have provided platforms for dissenting voices. As the conflict continues, the role of mass media will remain central to both the resolution and the escalation of the crisis.

Problem Statement

The ongoing Anglophone conflict in Cameroon has exposed deep-seated political, social, and economic divisions between the Anglophone and Francophone populations. Central to this conflict is the role of mass media in shaping narratives, influencing public opinion, and affecting policy decisions. The state-owned CRTV has been instrumental in controlling the national discourse, often presenting a one-sided narrative that frames the government as a legitimate authority fighting to preserve national unity. In contrast, alternative media outlets, including social media, have provided platforms for Anglophone activists and separatist leaders to voice their grievances and challenge the government’s narrative.

The problem, however, lies in the fact that mass media in the ongoing Anglophone conflict in Cameroon has become highly polarized, with each side using it as a tool for propaganda. CRTV’s coverage, which focuses on promoting the government’s perspective, has often ignored the root causes of the conflict, including issues of marginalization, language rights, and political representation. This has led to a situation where the media is not fostering dialogue or understanding between the conflicting parties but rather entrenching divisions.

Moreover, the media’s role in perpetuating stereotypes and fueling tensions has had serious consequences for peacebuilding efforts. By depicting the separatists as terrorists or insurgents, mass media has delegitimized their claims for autonomy or federalism, making it difficult for any meaningful dialogue to take place. At the same time, the government’s control over mass media has stifled the voices of those advocating for peaceful resolution, further escalating the conflict.

Thus, the key issue is that while mass media has the potential to play a constructive role in conflict resolution by promoting dialogue and understanding, its current usage in the Anglophone conflict has been counterproductive. This research seeks to explore how mass media, particularly CRTV, has shaped the Anglophone conflict in Cameroon and what can be done to ensure that it plays a more positive role in fostering peace and reconciliation.

By analyzing the content and impact of CRTV’s coverage

of the Anglophone conflict, this study aims to provide insights into the role of mass media in both escalating and resolving conflicts. It will explore how media narratives influence public perception and policy, and how alternative media platforms can be leveraged to promote more inclusive and balanced discussions. Given the importance of mass media in shaping societal narratives, understanding its role in the Anglophone conflict is critical for finding long-term solutions that address the root causes of the crisis and promote peace.

XAF 5,000 – Purchase Checkout Added to cart